Read it.
Use it.

When the engagement changes: reissuing a Puslinch consultant's TN documents

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch management consultant whose engagement changes should identify which documents must be reissued. The degree or five years of documented consulting experience stays as it is. The consulting agreement and the engaging entity's support letter must be rewritten to describe the new scope, period and contracting entity, and a materially changed case must be presented before the new work begins.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• The agreement in its new form
• The support letter from the engaging entity
• What does not change and what to do next

Read the full guide

Canadian PR, Chinese citizenship: which US routes remain for a Puslinch systems specialist

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch systems specialist has Canadian permanent residence but mainland-Chinese citizenship. TN is reserved for Canadian or Mexican citizens, and E-2 requires treaty-country nationality, which this passport does not provide. L classification does not turn on nationality, so a qualifying corporate relationship, foreign-employment year and company-specific role may provide the route instead.

Recruiters and hiring managers rarely distinguish between residence status and nationality, so a candidate in this position should raise it himself and in plain terms: he is settled in Canada but travels on a Chinese passport, which closes the professional trade-agreement route and the treaty investor route and leaves intracompany transfer. Saying that in the first conversation avoids an offer built on the wrong assumption, and it changes what the employer needs to do, because a transfer requires the company to file rather than the candidate to present himself. Employers who hear it late sometimes withdraw simply because the timeline no longer works.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• Tell the employer early, in one sentence
• What the transfer route asks instead
• Two calendars to add to the plan

Read the full guide

Signatures in order: financing, landlord and seller in a Puslinch couple's US purchase

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch couple buying a U.S. truck-wash business must obtain three counterparties' signatures in the right order. The lender determines whether borrowing leaves the buyers' own capital at risk, the landlord determines whether the premises remain available, and the seller's escrow terms determine when funds become irrevocably committed. Document any forced relocation as it happens.

Where part of the price is borrowed, the security determines whether that money is treated as the buyers' own capital at risk. Debt secured on the assets of the business being acquired shifts the risk onto the enterprise and is not counted. Debt secured on the buyers' own property, or a personal obligation for which they are liable, does place their assets at risk and ordinarily is counted. Ask the lender in writing what the security actually is and obtain the loan and security documents, not a term sheet. This is worth resolving before an offer is made, because restructuring the financing after the fact is slow and sometimes impossible.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• The lender, and what the debt is secured on
• The landlord, and the lease that may not assign
• The seller, and the point of no return

Read the full guide

A new US branch on L-1B: what a Puslinch equipment dealer must show at twelve months

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch equipment dealer opens a new U.S. parts-and-service branch and transfers a specialized-knowledge employee. The one-year petition must show secured premises, a qualifying corporate relationship, an active foreign business, financial ability to pay and commence operations, the beneficiary's qualifying year abroad, and the specialized role. Extension evidence must show what the first year actually produced.

The first filing must establish the parent, branch, subsidiary or affiliate relationship, that the foreign company is actively doing business, and that the beneficiary completed one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad within the preceding three years. The U.S. entity must be formed, sufficient premises secured, and the foreign company must show financial ability to pay the beneficiary and commence business. Finally, the beneficiary's specialized knowledge must be tied to the company's own products, processes or procedures rather than to general industry experience.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• What the first filing must establish
• The year the petition actually buys
• What changes at the extension

Read the full guide

L-1A or E-2 for a Puslinch logistics manager: which one survives someone changing their mind

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch logistics manager compares an employer-sponsored L-1A transfer with buying a treaty enterprise under E-2. L-1A can end if the qualifying relationship, active businesses or managerial role ends and is capped at seven years. E-2 can end if treaty ownership, substantial at-risk investment, control, real operation or non-marginality fails, and it offers no direct path to permanent residence. The relevant risk is factual, not abstract.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• What the employer controls on the L-1A route
• What the market controls on the E-2 route
• Deciding between them on facts rather than temperament

Read the full guide

When the principal's status moves: a Puslinch geologist's household and each member's exposure

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch geologist's household is affected when his principal status changes. A TD spouse may study but not work; an L-2 or E-2 spouse is employment-authorized incident to status, but that authorization remains derivative. Children may study, not work, and qualify only while unmarried and under twenty-one. Each family member therefore needs a separate contingency plan.

In TD status a spouse may not work at all, so the household's exposure is to the principal's income alone. In L-2 or E-2 dependent status a spouse is employment-authorised incident to status, which often becomes a second income the household relies on, and that authorisation is only as secure as the status it derives from. Regulation provides a limited discretionary period for several employment-based classifications when employment ends, capped and never beyond the validity already granted. It is a window in which to act, not permission to continue working. The household should know in advance what it would do inside that window.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• The spouse's position when employment ends
• The seventeen-year-old and the clock nobody controls
• The ten-year-old, and keeping one page current

Read the full guide

A stalled EB-5 or a Gold Card gift: what a Puslinch haulage owner is really choosing between

Hypothetical example: a Puslinch haulage owner with a stalled EB-5 petition compares that investment with an irreversible Gold Card gift. EB-5 uses at-risk capital in a job-creating enterprise and leads to two-year conditional residence, with Form I-829 filed in the 90 days before the second anniversary. Under the current official framework, Gold Card uses a processing fee, vetting and gift for an EB-1 or EB-2 lawful-permanent-residence process. Frustration with the pending case is not a reason to withdraw before reviewing both files and re-verifying Gold Card terms.

WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS

• What each one does with the money
• What each one does when things change
• Before withdrawing anything

Read the full guide